Continuing with the Ten Step Trades Leadership
When I'm out there training a group of maintenance tradesmen in industry I often hear "my supervisor won't let me do what I know needs to be done on that machine. I have to put in a report or work order and then it gets overlooked completely until a failure occurs."
Well there may be a few procedural problems to be dealt with here. But ultimately I haven't found too many maintenance leaders who don't want to let their teams own processes, procedures and even machines. It's just good leadership and delegation to let a team of passionate and reliable tradepersons 'run with the ball'.
I always encourage the tradesperson on the floor to communicate with his maintenance management group to find out more about the prioritizing of general service work vs. immediate/emergency vs. planned maintenance work so that he knows the process in use. The process of planning and scheduling work isn't meant to remove the qualified tradesperson from having a sense of ownership. As a leader, you know that it's about making sure that maintenance work is tracked, parts and materials are ready, that jobs are grouped up if possible to make the most efficient use of downtime.
On the other hand, teams and individual tradespersons on the front line can be developed into potential leaders if they are given as much ownership and autonomy as possible. This is where a lot of job satisfaction comes from.
If you're a tradesperson, ask to be included in the maintenance planning meetings where procedures are ironed out. You may get your chance in this environment to claim some additional ownership if you can make a good business case. Yes try to learn about the business/accounting realities in maintenance management. This will help.
If you're a supervisor, consider giving additional autonomy and ownership to your best team. Let them know what the parameters are and how they'll be held accountable (see Step 9) and then deploy. Done right, this should ease some of the workload for yourself and your planner.
Friday, August 26, 2011
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Step 9: Insist on Accountability and Team Learning
If as manager of maintenance you encourage ownership and team autonomy in your plant or shop environment, then this is the next logical step isn't it? It should be a natural fit.
If a team of technicians and their support group have shown that they can look after overall maintenance of a machine or group of machines without a manager breathing down their necks every day, then they are probably ready for a mission. A mission is a challenge. The challenge might be to increase the availability of a piece of mobile equipment, or it might be to beat last year's unplanned downtime by a certain number of hours in a particular corner of the plant. It might be to find an innovative practice that prevents a certain type of wear or a particular breakdown.
Once a reasonable challenge has been given and accepted, the autonomous team can be held to account. They accepted the challenge, therefor the results are theirs to speak to. Chances are great that they will beat the minimum requirement of the challenge. That's the nature of this kind of challenge given to an autonomous team. If they do in fact succeed they will have learned together in a powerful way.
If they don't succeed, then once again there is some team learning that can take place if it hasn't already. The function of accountability in this case is not to reprimand, but rather to help analyze where the efforts or execution of the challenge went off the track. A very open discussion on why the challenge was not met and what mistakes were made may find some tender spots in the egos of some team members. If blaming is avoided and amnesty is given for honest mistakes, the criticisms should allow team members to recommit and to carry what they've learned forward and to restructure the challenge and try again.
Was the manager leading this accountability meeting? Was the manager's presence even required in the discussion? What could or should the manager contribute to the team to coach their team learning? Your thoughts?
If a team of technicians and their support group have shown that they can look after overall maintenance of a machine or group of machines without a manager breathing down their necks every day, then they are probably ready for a mission. A mission is a challenge. The challenge might be to increase the availability of a piece of mobile equipment, or it might be to beat last year's unplanned downtime by a certain number of hours in a particular corner of the plant. It might be to find an innovative practice that prevents a certain type of wear or a particular breakdown.
Once a reasonable challenge has been given and accepted, the autonomous team can be held to account. They accepted the challenge, therefor the results are theirs to speak to. Chances are great that they will beat the minimum requirement of the challenge. That's the nature of this kind of challenge given to an autonomous team. If they do in fact succeed they will have learned together in a powerful way.
If they don't succeed, then once again there is some team learning that can take place if it hasn't already. The function of accountability in this case is not to reprimand, but rather to help analyze where the efforts or execution of the challenge went off the track. A very open discussion on why the challenge was not met and what mistakes were made may find some tender spots in the egos of some team members. If blaming is avoided and amnesty is given for honest mistakes, the criticisms should allow team members to recommit and to carry what they've learned forward and to restructure the challenge and try again.
Was the manager leading this accountability meeting? Was the manager's presence even required in the discussion? What could or should the manager contribute to the team to coach their team learning? Your thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
